Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated? | Kerstens, Kristiaan
/5

0 avis

Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated?

Archive ouverte : Article de revue

Kerstens, Kristiaan | Shen, Zhiyang | van de Woestyne, Ignace

Edité par HAL CCSD ; Elsevier

International audience

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

Procedures for ranking technical and cost efficient units: With a focus on nonconvexity | Kerstens, Kristiaan

Procedures for ranking technical and cost efficient units: With a focus on ...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Kerstens, Kristiaan | 2022-07-01

International audience. This contribution extends the literature on super-efficiency by focusing on ranking cost-efficient observations. To the best of our knowledge, the focus has always been on technical super-eff...

Economic and Environmental Decomposition of Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Total Factor Productivity Indicator: Empirical Analysis of Chinese Textile Firms With a Focus on Reporting Infeasibilities and Questioning Convexity | Balezentis, Tomas

Economic and Environmental Decomposition of Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen Tota...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Balezentis, Tomas | 2022-08-22

International audience. We discuss an environmental Luenberger–Hicks–Moorsteen (LHM) total factor productivity (TFP) indicator and its decomposition that incorporates a negative externality into the measurement of e...

Metatechnology frontier and convexity: A restatement | Kerstens, Kristiaan

Metatechnology frontier and convexity: A restatement

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Kerstens, Kristiaan | 2019-06-01

International audience. This article reconsiders the way metafrontiers and associated measures of efficiency are obtained from nonparametric estimates of underlying group-specific frontiers. Both convex and non-conv...

Chargement des enrichissements...