The relations between social capital and growth of innovative early stage firms: a contextual approach

Archive ouverte : Type de document indéfini

François, Valérie | Lafaye, Christophe, | Belarouci, Matthieu

Edité par HAL CCSD ; Edward Elgar Publishing Limited

International audience. The concept of social capital, widely acknowledged as the present and potential value that ensues from the social relations of individuals andsocial entities (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998), is increasingly used in entrepreneurship studies to explain the growth (Maurer et al., 2011; Partanen et al., 2008; Pirolo and Presutti, 2010; Prashantham and Dhanaraj, 2010) of established firms and innovative young enterprises (Anderson et al., 2007; Maurer and Ebers, 2006; Stam et al., 2014). However, empirical findings to date differ and are even contradictory. According to Stam et al. (2014) and Gedajlovic et al. (2013), the main explanation lies in the absence of contextual, organisational, temporal and institutional variables in previous studies. The authors suggest, first, that organisations are too different to be able to reach a consensus on a notion that is ‘extremely difficult’ to evaluate (Gedajlovic et al., 2013). Secondly, social capital is generally represented in an atemporal way, although several studies have shown that its nature and role evolve in line with the development process (Partanen et al., 2008), the business (Prashantham and Dhanaraj, 2010) or the individual (Cao et al., 2012). Finally, as Martinez and Aldrich (2011) suggest, the context, especially the institutional context in which the link between the company’s social capital and growth develops, plays a key role.Our study adopts this contextual perspective of social capital. The aim of the present study is to examine the role of social capital on growth. Tothis end, we analyse the perceived utility of resources received from the networks of innovative small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) entrepreneurs (‘organisational context’) during the first six years of existence (‘temporal context’), selecting firms that received some form of public support from the French Nord-Pas-de-Calais region (‘institutional context’).Our study differentiates between internal social capital (ISC) and external social capital (ESC) (Adler and Kwon, 2002) which is better adapted to astudy on innovative young enterprises (Cao et al., 2012; Cuevas-Rodriguez et al., 2014; Davidsson and Honig, 2003; Debrulle et al., 2014; Yli-Renko et al., 2002).Our hypotheses aim to provide elements of contextual responses to the entrepreneurial debate on the role of social capital in the growth ofinnovative young firms. Thus, we begin by analysing whether there is a significant link between ISC and ESC and the growth of innovativeenterprises in the company’s early years. We then test the moderating role of incubators and clusters – as institutional variables – on the link between the social capital and growth of a young enterprise. Two distinct groups of French firms from the Nord-Pas de Calais region were used in this study: in the first group, the firms had been hosted by an incubator, while in the second group, they had received public assistance in the form of advice or subsidies.Our findings confirm that ESC has a positive role on growth in the context of innovative young firms, contrary to ISC. We point to the existenceof a potential threshold effect linked to the size of the firm in terms of number of employees, beyond which ISC impacts on innovation andultimately on growth. Finally, our findings do not support the notion that firms which have passed through an incubator have a greater level of ESC,subsequently ensuring better growth.The chapter begins by defining the notion of social capital – more specifically, internal and ESC – through the lens of specific organisational,temporal and institutional contexts. The study hypotheses that we test are drawn from our review of the literature. We then describe the researchmethod used and the analytical framework adopted. Finally, we present and discuss our findings, and make recommendations together with possible avenues for future research.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

The role of social capital in the growth of young innovative firms: Incubated versus non-incubated. El papel del capital social en el crecimiento de las jóvenes empresas innovadoras: diferencias entre las usuarias y no usuarias de viveros. Le rôle du capital social sur la croissance des jeunes entreprises innovantes : incubées versus non incubée | Belarouci, Matthieu

The role of social capital in the growth of young innovative firms: Incubat...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Belarouci, Matthieu | 2019

International audience. The concept of social capital is increasingly used in entrepreneurship studies to explain the growth of young innovative firms (JEI) (jeunes entreprises innovantes). However, empirical findin...

Les caractéristiques des jeunes entreprises innovantes sociofinancées : approche comparative selon les modes de levée de fonds | Belarouci, Matthieu

Les caractéristiques des jeunes entreprises innovantes sociofinancées : app...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Belarouci, Matthieu | 2019

International audience. Souvent présenté comme un mode de financement alternatif, le financement participatif – ou crowdfunding – est devenu une source potentielle de levée de fonds pour les jeunes entreprises innov...

Do academic spin-offs outperform young innovative companies? A comparison of survival rates and growth | François, Valérie

Do academic spin-offs outperform young innovative companies? A comparison o...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

François, Valérie | 2021-08-27

International audience. Purpose This article investigates the distinctive characteristics and the performance of academic spin-offs within young innovative companies (YICs) supported by public regional agencies. Con...

Chargement des enrichissements...