A co-elaborative tool to assess growing pigs welfare

Archive ouverte : Poster de conférence

Courboulay, Valérie | Meunier-Salaün, Marie-Christine | Pol, Françoise | Stankowiak, Marie

Edité par HAL CCSD ; Wageningen Academic Publishers

Animal welfare assessment systems are mainly used by external auditors. Better commitment could be achieved if farmers could assess the welfare of their pigs themselves and act to improve it. A project was designed to build an animal welfare assessment tool with farmers from three different French regions. An exhaustive list of criteria was established at three co-design workshops involving farmers, their advisers and animal welfare experts. Farmers indicated how they evaluated whether their animals were doing well, either spontaneously in a brainstorming discussion, or by answering to questions from a naïve visitor. Then representatives of the groups gathered, prioritized and selected the criteria according to four dimensions: housing (cleanliness, moisture, resting posture), behaviour (fear of human, use of enrichment material),health (diarrhoea, coughing, lameness, severe body/tail lesions, physical appearance) and feeding (trough/drinker cleanliness, low body weight). They proposed rapid measurement methods (observation at group level from the corridor and individually in the pen) and stages to use them: two rooms in the post weaning period (PW) and two rooms in the growingfinishing period (G). A prototype tool was built on these bases. Farmers and advisers scored their animals twice, after the training session and six months later (spring 2017). The first series of evaluation indicated that lameness frequency was lower in PW than in G (0.27 vs 0.41% of pigs) and ranged from 0 to 1.7% (PW) and 3.6% (G). Exploratory behaviour was scored whenentering the room and 10 minutes later. The percentage of pens with enrichment investigation was higher after 10 minutes presence, higher in PW period than in G period (34.5 vs 23.1%) and ranged from 0 to 100% of pens. The feedback of both sessions will allow to assess the feasibility of this tool in different type of farms, the difficulties encountered in the implementation by the farmers and to finalize with them a list of relevant measures.

Consulter en ligne

Suggestions

Du même auteur

BEEP: An advisory pig welfare assessment tool developed by farmers for farmers. BEEP : Un outil de conseil d'évaluation du bien-être chez le porc, développé par des éleveurs pour des éleveurs | Courboulay, Valérie

BEEP: An advisory pig welfare assessment tool developed by farmers for farm...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Courboulay, Valérie | 2020

International audience. Farm animal welfare is now an obvious goal for all livestock stakeholders. However, the ways to improve it are neither easy nor evident for animal caretakers or their advisers. Most welfare a...

BEEP : un outil à disposition des éleveurs pour objectiver le bien-être de leurs animaux | Courboulay, Valérie

BEEP : un outil à disposition des éleveurs pour objectiver le bien-être de ...

Archive ouverte: Communication dans un congrès

Courboulay, Valérie | 2019-02-05

Animal welfare issues often appear as constraints for farmers, even though they are the people best placed to talk about their animals and practices. An animal welfare assessment tool was co-constructed with farmers from three reg...

The welfare of farmed pigs. Bien-être et élevage des porcs | Meunier-Salaün, Marie-Christine

The welfare of farmed pigs. Bien-être et élevage des porcs

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Meunier-Salaün, Marie-Christine | 2007

National audience. The current intensive system of pig production is the outcome of better control of the environment, prevention of infectious disease, a fee-ding strategy adapted to the nutritional needs of pigs, ...

Du même sujet

BEEP : un outil à disposition des éleveurs pour objectiver le bien-être de leurs animaux | Courboulay, Valérie

BEEP : un outil à disposition des éleveurs pour objectiver le bien-être de ...

Archive ouverte: Communication dans un congrès

Courboulay, Valérie | 2019-02-05

Animal welfare issues often appear as constraints for farmers, even though they are the people best placed to talk about their animals and practices. An animal welfare assessment tool was co-constructed with farmers from three reg...

Influence des conditions d’élevage sur le stress pré - abattage et la qualité de la viande: cas des bovins | Lensink, Bernardus Johan

Influence des conditions d’élevage sur le stress pré - abattage et la quali...

Archive ouverte: Communication dans un congrès

Lensink, Bernardus Johan | 2006-06-08

National audience

L' étonnante intelligence des oiseaux / Nathan Emery | Emery, Nathan J. (1971-....). Auteur

L' étonnante intelligence des oiseaux / Nathan Emery

Livre | Emery, Nathan J. (1971-....). Auteur | 2017

« Tête de linotte ! », « cervelle de piaf ! »... Les humains abusent de noms d'oiseaux et se moquent au passage de leur prétendue bêtise. Mais savons-nous réellement de quoi nous parlons ? De la corneille japonaise qui casse ses n...

Stockmanship and farm animal welfare | Boivin, Xavier

Stockmanship and farm animal welfare

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Boivin, Xavier | 2003

International audience

Manifeste des espèces compagnes : chiens, humains et autres partenaires / Donna Haraway | Haraway, Donna Jeanne (1944-....). Auteur

Manifeste des espèces compagnes : chiens, humains et autres partenaires / D...

Livre | Haraway, Donna Jeanne (1944-....). Auteur | 2019

Ce livre propose un pari audacieux : prendre notre relation avec les chiens au sérieux et apprendre "une éthique et une politique dévolues à la prolifération de relations avec des êtres autres qui comptent". Car la catégorie des e...

Proteolytic activity of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Mongolian traditional dairy products: A multiparametric analysis | Raveschot, Cyril

Proteolytic activity of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Mongolian tradi...

Archive ouverte: Article de revue

Raveschot, Cyril | 2020-01-30

Chargement des enrichissements...